ARCHIVE AND CONQUER

Month

October 2010

12 posts

Oct 21, 201028 notes
Oct 21, 20101 note
#REALLY #HUH #VISIONS OF MY FUTURE SELF #MOBY DUCK
Oct 19, 20107 notes
#CLUTTER #YARD SCULPTURES #SATC #ACCRUE
Oct 13, 20102 notes
#DELIGHT #WELCOME DISTRACTION #TARGET PRACTICE
Oct 9, 20101 note
#BUILDING RUINS #MATERIALS #REMAINS
Oct 7, 201022 notes
#DATA INGESTION #DIGESTION #INNIE/OUTIE
Oct 7, 201067 notes
#BONERS #ERECTOR SETS #REMAINS
Oct 5, 20102 notes
#PENGUINS #CRUEL JOKES #THEME PARK AS FARCE #IMAGINED WORLDS
Oct 4, 201018 notes
#PERSONAL COLLECTIONS
Oct 4, 2010
#HIGHLY PARTIAL #KEYWORD SEARCH CURATE #PRINTED MATTER

However, all of this paper’s authors share a keen appreciation for what Richard Ovenden has helpfully called (in conversation) “the digital materiality of digital culture.” We would gloss this as a curatorial sensitivity toward the uniqueness of individual instances of both hardware and data objects, coupled with an awareness of how the affordances of particular systems, environments, and technologies can all impact the creative process. For example, knowing how much of a document would be visible on a screen at one time—knowledge that depends on the physical size of the display hardware, its screen resolution, and preferences as defined within particular application software—can be critical to understanding aspects of an author’s composition process.

…

As preservationists we would therefore do well to ask: what are the dust jackets of the digital age? What seemingly incidental features of the digital environment may turn out to have value for a researcher whose future interests we cannot foresee? What software (perhaps even spyware) is the equivalent of Jane Austen’s creaking door?

—Digital Materiality: Preserving Access to Computers as Complete Environments
Matthew G. Kirschenbaum1, Erika L. Farr2, Kari M. Kraus1, Naomi Nelson2, Catherine Stollar Peters3, Gabriela Redwine4, Doug Reside1

Oct 4, 2010
#DIGITAL MATERIALITY #DIGITAL ASHES DIGITAL URN BRUH #AUFHEBEN #NERDERY

Larsen’s most significant work, Marble Springs (1993), exists in a number of physical and digital states which exhibit complex relationships and dependencies. A shower curtain, for example, is the support for a dozen laminated screenshots representing different pieces of the work; these are connected by colored yarn mapping their links and relations. An artifact such as this, coupled with hard copy printouts and transcripts, coupled with digital drafts in various formats and versions of the HyperCard software used as the final authoring environment, is emblematic of the kind of challenge archivists in a number of different cultural heritage sectors can expect to face in the future: not just born-digital content, but digital-analog hybrids.

-Digital Materiality: Preserving Access to Computers as Complete Environments
Matthew G. Kirschenbaum, Erika L. Farr, Kari M. Kraus, Naomi Nelson, Catherine Stollar Peters, Gabriela Redwine, Doug Reside, p. 109

Sometimes the academic articles I read for class sound like excerpts from Borges.

Oct 4, 2010
#COMPUTER COZIES #MARBLE SPRINGS #SHOWER CURTAIN #CELLAR DOOR
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 3
  • February 2
  • March 2
  • April
  • May 1
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 2
  • February 4
  • March 1
  • April 11
  • May 8
  • June
  • July 8
  • August
  • September 1
  • October 3
  • November 4
  • December 2
2010 2011 2012
  • January 6
  • February 4
  • March 12
  • April 4
  • May 5
  • June 2
  • July 2
  • August 7
  • September
  • October 7
  • November 11
  • December
2009 2010 2011
  • January 16
  • February 19
  • March 13
  • April 6
  • May 7
  • June 2
  • July 3
  • August 4
  • September 12
  • October 12
  • November 17
  • December 8
2009 2010
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June 27
  • July 29
  • August 14
  • September 21
  • October 16
  • November 11
  • December 12